Michigan Sex Crime Attorneys Blog

November 18, 2010

Michigan Sex Crimes And Teens

In the wake of the recent tragedy resulting from a teenage sexual encounter in Huron Township, legal experts are saying that Michigan’s criminal sexual conduct laws should be reconsidered. Using felony offenses to punish an older teenage boy against a younger teenage girl (and vice versa) makes bad public policy.

The Huron Township case involves sex between a 14-year-old girl and an 18-year-old boy. Initially, the girl indicated it was consensual, then recanted and said she had been raped. By law, however, 14 year-old is not able to “consent” despite his or her willing participation in a sexual encounter. After receiving intense ridicule at school, the girl committed suicide.

This case has brought the issue of teen sex and Michigan criminal sexual conduct laws to the forefront. The reality is that teens live in a highly sexually society, with significant numbers of teens engaged in sexual relations and sexting. Treating these behaviors as felonies, with the result mandatory registration on the Michigan sex crimes registry, is unjust and disproportionate to the act involved.

A recent article in the Detroit Free Press labeled Michigan’s’ all-or-nothing legal scheme is “lunacy” – with the boundaries between “perpetrator” and “victim” based on calendar age arbitrary, noting “Some 14-year-old girls are sexually savvy, others are shockingly naïve. Some 18-year-old boys are predatory; and some lack the maturity, or at least the superficial sophistication, of the younger women competing for their attention.”

November 4, 2010

Michigan Supreme Court To Hear Homeless Sex Crime Registry Violation Case

by Scott Grabel

The Michigan Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments concerning whether a homeless man who failed to comply with the sex crimes registration requirement can be charged with a violation.

At issue – whether it is a due process violation to prosecute someone for failing to register their residence when they lack a home.

MCL 28.725(1) provides:
An individual required to be registered under this act shall notify the local law enforcement agency or sheriff’s department having jurisdiction where his or her new residence or domicile is located within 10 days after the individual changes or vacates his or her residence, domicile, or place of work or education, including any charge required to be reported under [MCL 28.724(a).]
Here, the prosecution has charged Dowdy with violating this statute by failing to register.

Earlier this year the Court of Appeals for Ingham County held that the fact that a person has no residence by definition makes it impossible for homeless people to report their “domicile or residence.” As such, both the lower court and the appellate court found the charge violated Mr. Dowdy’s constitutional right to due process.

October 22, 2010

Michigan Sex Offender Sweep Underway

by Scott Grabel

Beginning this week, Michigan State Police will conduct a two week sex offender sweep with the intended purpose of locating sex offenders who have failed to verify their addresses.

Pursuant to the Michigan Sex Offender Registry Act (SORA) individuals convicted of crimes of a sexual nature are forced to register as a sex offender. The type of offense dictates for how long an individual must keep his or her name on the list.

Further, SORA requires individuals to keep this information current, including verifying addresses 4 times a year and updating addresses within ten days of moving. The reporting requirements are too complex for most individuals to understand, and to keep up-to-date on as time passes. Unfortunately though, the penalties are harsh for those who fail to meet all the specific reporting requirements and can result in additional fines and incarceration.

Often because of an oversight or innocent mistake, individuals fail to check-in. “Sweeps” like the one in progress occur to track down offenders and determine why someone has failed to register and often, impose additional penalties.

October 14, 2010

Wayne County Jury Acquits Pastor Of Statutory Rape

by Scott Grabel

According to the Detroit News, a Wayne County jury has found a Detroit minister not guilty of all charges stemming from an arrest for alleged statutory rape.

A 16-year-old boy alleged that the minister had sex with him no less than three times when he was only 15. Michigan’s age of consent is 16. The law does not require any criminal intent to prove statutory rape, simply that a person under 16 years of age engaged in sexual relations with an adult.

Because an individual may be convicted of a criminal sexual conduct offense without any physical evidence of an assault or other supporting evidence, it is crucial to hire an aggressive defense attorney if you have been charged with statutory rape or any other criminal sexual conduct charge.

Often, finding the true motivation for making the accusation of sexual misconduct is one of the most important components of a successful defense. Here, evidence presented at trial revealed that the alleged victim and another man made up the stories of sexual relations as revenge against the pastor, a man known for taking troubled teens into his home.

October 6, 2010

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument Regarding Damages To Victims For Erroneous Placement On Sex Offender Registry

by Scott Grabel

The U.S. Supreme Court heard testimony on Tuesday in a nightmarish tale underscoring the devastating effect sex crimes allegations can have on individual’s reputation and livelihood. In Los Angeles County v. Humphries, a California couple seeks to recover damages against L.A. County for the failure to remove their names from a list of known or suspected child abusers after they had been found innocent of any crime.

In Humphries, the accuseds’ 15-year-old daughter stole the family car from her father and mother in California and ran away to Utah, to live with her biological mother and stepfather. The teen told her family in Utah she had been sexually abused for months. The police placed the California parents’ names on the Child Abuse Central Index, a sexual offenders registry. After further investigation, no evidence was found and the parents were declared “factually innocent,” cleared of all charges. However, Los Angeles County failed to remove their names, citing a lack of procedure to do so. Even after receiving a court order to destroy the records, the County kept their names on the list.

The Humphrieses subsequently brought charges against the County, alleging due process violations and asserting the right to recover damages.

The federal appeals court determined that the Humphrieses were entitled to damages. CNN reports, however, that the Supreme Court appeared “split,” questioning whether this is a state or local issue, and how to address the constitutional violation.

Apart from the obviously critical legal arguments, this case illustrates the havoc that can result from the combination of false accusations and overzealous law enforcement officials. The Humphrieses’ lives have been turned upside down, they’ve lost job opportunities, income and had their reputations tarnished – despite a determination of innocence, the damage continues.

September 29, 2010

Man Exonerated Of Rape After Serving 10 Years In Prison

by Scott Grabel

Earlier this week a 39-year-old Dallas,Texas man – Stephen Brodie – was exonerated
of the rape of a 5-year-old girl after a judge determined he was innocent. He was released the next day, and his dad was there to greet him as he exited the jail.

On Monday, a judge ruled Brodie had been wrongly prosecuted despite a lack of physical evidence. In many states, including Michigan, individuals may be convicted of criminal sexual conduct without any physical evidence of an assault or any other supporting evidence. Here, not only was there no evidence, but prosecutors had contradictory hair and finger print evidence that conclusively excluded Brodie as the perpetrator, yet they failed to turn this evidence over to his defense attorney. Police officers also knew that a fingerprint found at the victim’s home did not match Brodie’s.

The Dallas County District Attorney’s office issued an apology this week.

Deaf since childhood, Brodie’s imprisonment was largely a result of a confession he gave after being questioned for hours without an interpreter. Studies by the Innocence Project show that in many cases, innocent people confess during police interrogation as a result of duress, coercion, diminished capacity, and ignorance of the law. Brodie later told The Associated Press he had felt scared and pressured. The judge admitted the confession, and believing it the best option, Brodie pleaded guilty to assault and accepted a five-year sentence. He then served two additional sentences for failure to register as a sex offender. Now that he has been exonerated, Brodie no longer needs to place his name of the sex crimes registry.

Tragically, Brodie spent 10 years of his life behind bars as the result of a crime he didn’t commit. Experts estimate that nearly 5,000 wrongfully convicted men and woman are locked up today in Michigan’s prisons.

September 16, 2010

Past Mistakes Shouldn’t Keep Those With Felony Convictions From Volunteering

by Scott Grabel

A group of Grand Rapids parents are circulating petitions to allow them to participate in their children’s education through volunteering. At issue – past criminal convictions and the fact that some of the parent’s names are on the Sex Offender Registry. The Grand Rapids school district, as well as all school districts in Kent and Ottawa counties – screens all school volunteers and will not allow anyone with a felony conviction to participate.

As stated by one parent, “Something you did back in the day when you were young and dumb, should not be allowed to haunt you forever and make you a less effective parent.”

In fact, many of those with names on the sex crimes registry are there as a result of “Romeo/Juliet” type relationships.

Understanding that the involvement of parents is vital to their children’s success at school, parents are requesting that the school decide whether to allow the parent volunteers on a case-by-case basis. Due to current laws, a parent whose name is on the registry will likely not be able to volunteer, but the petition circulated by the parents underscores the lasting impact youthful indiscretions may have on your future.

Hopefully, the school district will allow parents who are trying to do the right thing to be involved and make a difference in their child’s education.

September 9, 2010

Man Lured Into Internet Sex Sting To Stand Trial

by Scott Grabel

A man lured into a sex sting has been found competent to stand trial and will appear Friday in Livingston County Circuit Court. The Detroit man was one of nine men caught in an undercover sex sting targeting individuals who use the internet to send pictures or explicit materials to minors.

With the proliferation of chat rooms and social networking sites, law enforcement agencies have increasingly set up “stings” by attempting to lure otherwise law-abiding citizens into inappropriate conversations with minors. When officers entice individuals into downloading or sharing inappropriate images over the internet, this may be used as evidence of criminal conduct, such as solicitation of a minor. However, if the police overstep their authority and violate individual’s rights, the defense of entrapment may be used to gain an acquittal or dismissal of an internet sex crimes charge.

In Michigan, entrapment occurs when the police engage in impermissible conduct that would induce a law-abiding citizen under similar circumstances to commit the crime, or police engage in conduct so reprehensible that it cannot be tolerated by the court.

August 12, 2010

Michigan DNA Analysis Backlog Leaves The Accused Waiting For Justice

by Scott Grabel

Last month the Detroit Free Press ran a series exposing a serious problem affecting all of those interested in criminal justice – the overwhelming backlog of cases requiring biological testing – including DNA testing – which is often the key to freedom for those wrongfully accused and convicted.

Today the South Bend Tribune echoed that sentiment, calling for the elimination of Michigan’s serious backlog of thousands of forensic cases.

As a Michigan sex crimes defense attorney, I agree. According to the Detroit FreePress,10,500 untested rape kits existed at the beginning of 2010. The number has since grown. In spite of this backlog, Michigan has passed legislation to collect DNA from all those arrested for felonies, but not yet tried or convicted. Rather than expanding the number of people subjected to DNA analysis, emphasis should be placed on processing rape kits and other samples. Often, DNA analysis is the key to freedom for those wrongfully convicted.

DNA evidence freed Kenneth Wyniemko who was imprisoned for nine years for a rape he didn’t commit.

DNA evidence freed Rickie Seggie, an innocent Sterling Heights man headed for trial on charges of criminal sexual assault.

July 22, 2010

Federal Appeals Court To Review Ingham County Rape Conviction

by Scott Grabel

According to the Detroit Free Press, the entire 6th Circuit Court of Appeals will review a 2001 rape conviction.

At issue – rape shield laws. Specifically, under what circumstances can the sex life of alleged rape victim be used by the defense at trial.

Generally, Michigan law excludes evidence of the victim’s sexual conduct or reputation at trial. However, exceptions may exist in limited circumstances – such as where the sexual conduct is between the accused and the victim, and where the past conduct is relevant to the case at hand.

Here, in a rape trial alleging non-consensual group sex, evidence of a previous act of group sex including the accused and the alleged victim was withheld. The accused – Lewis Gagne – was ultimately convicted and sentenced to up to 45 years in prison.

On appeal, a 3-person panel determined that Gagne’s rights were violated at trial. The full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has now agreed to revisit the case, finding that based on the facts of this case, the trial court violated the defendant’s due process rights in applying Michigan’s rape shield law.